IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT THERE HAS BEEN A REOCCURRING FRAUDULENT CON GAME THAT THAT HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO STEAL AN INHERITANCE AND MANY OTHER EITHER MONETARY ITEMS , FROM CARS TO JEWELRY , SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES , BUSINESSES ETC ALL DONE IN UNDER FALSE PRETENSES PRETENDING TO BE ME - WHEN IN FACT YOU ARE NOT EVEN MY BLOODLINE ! I AN HOLDING YOU AND ANYONE ELSE WHO HAS MADE ANY MONEY OR GAINED FROM THESE ILLEGAL ACTS IN ANY WAY !
YOU HAVE SEXUALLY VIOLATED ME AND HAD ME GANG RAPED YOU HAVE EVEN GONE AS FAR AS SNEAKING INTO MY DREAM-STATE TO ASSAULT ME AND TO TRY AND FORCE ME TO ACCEPT YOU AS A BUSINESS/FRIEND WITH BENEFITS PARTNER WHICH I HAD ALREADY TOLD YOU "NO" TO . YOU HAVE WAITED TO TRY AND SNEAK OR TRICK ME INTO BAD CONTRACK'S IN THE PAST AND HAVE THEN BEGUN LIVING A LIFE THAT YOU HAD STOLEN FROM ME BY LYING YOUR WAY THROUGH LIFE HOVERING OVER ME AS I WAS IN WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE PRIVACY OF MY OWN BEDROOM AND THEN INVITING OTHERS TO ALSO COME AND VIOLATE ME AS WELL , YOU POOR EXCUSE FOR A WOMAN ESPECIALLY SINCE YOU THEN PRETENDED TO BE SUCH AN ANGELIC BEING WHEN IN TRUTH YOU WERE A DARK DEMONIC ENTITY WHO HAS BEEN DECEIVING MY EX (OF OVER 20 + YEARS) INTO BELIEVING THAT YOU WERE SOMEHOW MORE WORTHY OF HIS HAND IN MARRIAGE AND MY SPIRITUAL BIRTHRIGHT - AND I AM PLACING THIS PUBLIC NOTICE HERE ON MY PERSONAL PUBLIC BLOG TO INFORM YOU AND ANY OF YOUR OTHER TROLLS THAT YOUR GAME OF CONNING AND STEALING AND SPREADING FALSE SLANDERISH FAKE INCIDENTS THAT YOU CLAIMED THAT I HAD DONE OR HAD TAKEN A PART OF YOU ARE A LIAR AND I HAVE NEVER EVEN MET YOU , YOU LOW-LIFE DEMON WHO I AM HERE RIGHT NOW TO SLAY ! MAY YOU BE BROUGHT TO YOUR OWN DEMISE FOR TELLING ALL THE LIES AND MAKING OTHERS FEEL AS IF I WERE SOMEONE WHO DESERVED TO BE MISTREATED JUST SO THAT YOU AND MY EX COULD COVER UP THE FACT THAT YOU HAD IN FACT ALREADY BEEN ENGAGING IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES FOR QUITE SOME TIME PRIOR TO WHEN I ORIGINALLY CALLED YOU BOTH OUT FOR IT AND YOU BOTH THEN DECIDED TO DO A SMEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST ME TO MAKE UP FALSE CLAIMS AND TRY AND DEFAME MY GOOD NAME WHILE YOU ALSO TRIED TO STEAL MY IDENTITY AND IMPERSONATE ME IN A COURT HEARING WHERE HE CLAIMED TO BE MY HUSBAND AND THAT THIS FAKE SIDE CHICK WAS ACTUALLY ME AND THAT HE WERE MY POWER OF ATTORNEY WHEN IN FACT YOU WERE NOT MY HUSBAND AT ALL AND HAD BEEN LYING FOR YEARS MAKING THAT STATEMENT IN THE PUBLIC TO MAKE HIMSELF SEEM TO BE MORE CREDIBLE THAN HE ACTUALLY WAS - YET YELLING AT ME IN PRIVATE SAYING THINGS LIKE "THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER MARRY YOU " THIS AFTER I ASKED HIM IF HE WERE SEEING SOMEONE ELSE - YOU AND YOUR NEW- PARTNER HAVE DONE SUCH SEVERE DAMAGE TO ME AND MY FAMILY EVEN TRYING TO COME BETWEEN ME AND MY FAMILY MEMBERS BY BECOMING INTIMATELY INVOLVED JUST SO THAT YOU COULD ALL BENEFIT FROM THE WEALTH THAT WAS NOT EVEN YOURS TO TOUCH IN THE FIRST PLACE - BTW MY ANCESTORS SAID THAT YOU WERE NOT WORTHY OF HAVING SUCH A FINE AND DIVINE LOVE AS I , so - YOU ARE BUSTED AND YOU ARE ALSO DESPICABLE THERE IS NO DEFENSE AND YOU DID TOO DAMN MUCH TO TRY AND DESTROY AN INNOCENT DISABLED 60 YEAR OLD WOMAN SIMPLY DUE TO YOUR GREED AND YOUR ADDICTION TO SEX WHICH YOU HID FROM ME AND LIED AND DID NOTHING TO PROVIDE FOR ME YET USED MY MONEY TO SUPPORT A PERSON WHO WAS A SEXUAL - INTEREST WHOM YOU COULD NOT KEEP YOUR LOVE STICK IN ITS PANTS AND YOUR LUST IS WHAT ALSO MADE YOU COMMIT THE CRIME OF FRAUD THEFT SLANDER , STALKING HACKING , MALI FRAUD , PERJURY FORGERY INSURANCE FRAUD , FILING FALSE CLAIMS AND CALLING EMPLOYER'S ATTEMPTING TO GET ME FIRED , STEALING MY INHERITANCE SO THAT YOU TWO COULD LIVE A BETTER LIFE WHILE I LIVED IN LOW-INCOME-HOUSING AND I ACTUALLY HAD A HOUSE THAT WAS LEFT TO ME THAT YOU CHANGED THE NAME ON THE DEED AND THEN LET THE HOUSE BE DESTROYED OR LIED AND CLAIMED THAT YOU LOST IT JUST TO KEEP IT FROM ME - NOT TO MENTION THAT YOU HAD BEEN LIVING OFF OF MY WEALTH FOR OVER 10 ? YEARS WHILE HAVING ME PLACED ON A GOV WATCH LIST AND ALSO A "DO NOT PAY " LIST SO THAT YOU COULD COLLECT FROM MY HARD WORK as A FEDERAL - WHISTLEBLOWER WHILE PUBLICLY CALLING ME LAZY , STUPID , INCOMPETENT ETC DOING THIS TO MAKE ME SEEM AS IF I DID NOT DESERVE ANY AWARD FOR THE EXCELLENT WORK THAT I AM KNOWN FOR -HOPING TO THEN STEAL MY WORK AND CLAIM IT AS YOUR OWN SO THAT YOU WOULD SEEM SUCCESSFUL OR AS SUCCESSFUL AS I WAS - YOU ARE AN ABOMINATION AND YOU WILL BE DEALT WITH
I AM DEMANDING THAT ANY MONEY THAT HAS BEEN STOLEN FROM ME THROUGH THE FRAUD ON THE COURTS BE IMMEDIATELY DEPOSITED INTO AN ACCOUNT THAT I ACTUALLY CONTROL SINCE YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN SETTING UP FAKE ACCOUNTS IN MY NAME THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF SEATTLE AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND EVEN IN OTHER COUNTRIES THIS IS A FINANCIAL CRIME AND FINCEN HAS ALL OF YOUR MOVES BEING TRACED SO HAVE MULTIPLE FEDERAL AGENCIES - YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO CON YOUR WAY OUT OR LIE, CRY OR BRIBE YOUR WAY OUT !
I AM HOLDING YOU UNDER JUDGEMENT IN THE SPIRITUAL COURTS AND ALSO SEEKING THE SAME IN THE JUDICIAL COURT SYSTEM ANYONE WORKING WITH YOU SHALL ALSO BE HELD BY THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS - YOU HAVE DISRESPECTED ME AND HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY TRAFICING ME WITH A HIDDEN CAMERA WHICH I DID NOT CONSENT TO , YOU HAVE OPENED MY MAIL HAD MY MAIL REROUTED OR BRIBED WORKERS AT THE USPS TO RELEASE MAIL THAT WAS NOT YOURS BY USING YOUR STOLEN ID THAT YOU HAD MADE IN MY NAME BUT WITH YOUR PICTURE ! I AM DISGUSTED AND VEXED THAT YOU WOULD BELIEVE THAT YOU COULD CONTINUE TO MISTREAT ME EVEN TRY AND HAVE ME KILLED SO THAT YOU COULD PROFIT FROM MY DEATH (SLAYERS LAW STATES THAT NO PERSON CAN PROFIT FROM A DEATH THAT THEY CAUSED OR HAD ANY INCLUSION IN THE ATTEMPT TO KILL - THE SAME PERSON FOR WHICH THEY HAVE A POLICY ON -
I HAVE BEEN A KNOWN TARGET RO MANY IN THIS CITY-(CITIES) AS THEY ALL COLLUDED TOGETHER AGAINST ME IN RETALIATION FOR THE GREAT WORK THAT I DO AS A "RELATOR" UNDER THE WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS THESE ACTS THAT WERE ALLOWED TO OCCUR AGAINST ME AND THAT WHICH HAS ALSO CAUSED ME TO SUFFER NOT JUST PAIN AND SUFFERING BUT ALSO FINANCIAL HARDSHIPS , DEPRIVATIONS OF MY RIGHT TO RELIEF , MENTAL ANGUISH LOSS OF CONSORTIUM - WHEN THEY MADE A BAD FAITH CONTRACT BEHIND MT BACK WITH MY EX -LIFE PARTNER TO TURN HIS BACK ON ME IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY OR SEX ETC AND THEN PROCEEDED TO DIMINISH AND PREVERT HIS MIND (WITH WITCHCRAFT /MK ULTRA SEX-BINDING SPELLS ETC) AND INTENTIONALLY TURNED HIM AGAINST ME- WHILE TELLING HIM LIES TO MAKE HIM LAY WITH HER AND THEN PRETENDING TO BE CARRYING HIS CHILD WHEN IN FACT IT WAS NOT EVEN HIS CHAILD BUT SHE WANTED TO BREAK US APART AND THEN BLACKMAILED HIM TELLING HIM THAT SHE WOULD TELL ME EVERYTHING AND ALSO HACKING MY ACCOUNTS AND LEAVING RUDE COMMENTS ABOUT HIS SEX ORGAN AND AND WHAT THEY HAD BEEN DOING SEXUALLY WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN TRUE BUT SHE WANTED TO FLAUNT IT AS IF SHE WAS HIS CHOICE OVER ME WHILE OMITTING THE USE OF WITCHCRAFT AND DRUGS ETC TO CONFUSE HIM TO ACT OUT OF CHARACTER AND DO AS SHE DEMANDED HE DO - WHILE THE COVEN PROCEEDED TO THEN ATTACK ME AND PLACE FALSE CLAIMS ON THE RECORD IN MY NAME KNOWING THAT THESE CLAIMS WERE IN FACT FALSE WITH THE INTENT TO CAUSE ME HARM , ARREST , OR EVEN MY DEATH FOR SOMETHING THAT I WAS IN FACT NOT INVOLVED IN OR HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF . WHILE ALSO DENYING ME MY RIGHT TO DUE-PROCESS BY INTERFERING WITH MY MAIL AND THEN HAVING AN ACTRESS APPEAR IN COURT AS ME TO OBTAIN MY PORTION OF MONEY THAT THEY THEN SHARED YET DEPRIVED ME OF OR THEY MADE FALSE STATEMENTS TO ELIMINATE ME FROM RECEIVING WHAT WAS RIGHTFULLY MINE AS A WHISTLEBLOWER MAKING ME SEEM AS IF I WERE INCOMPETENT AS THEY HAD STATED JUST TO GAIN FROM MY WORK AND CAUSE ME TO LOSE OUT WHEN I WAS ALREADY SEEN AS THE AWARD RECIPIENT , ALL DUE TO THEIR EXTREME MALICE JEALOUSY AND ENVY THE FEMALE TAKING IT UPON HERSELF TO ALSO DIVULGE MY NAME AND PERSONAL INFO TO PLACE ME IN HARMS WAY ON PURPOSE SO THAT I WOULD NOT BE COMPETITION FOR THE ATTENTION OF MY ALREADY -LIFE PARTNER WHOM SHE HAD SET HER SIGHTS ON MAKING HER-OWN KEEPING ME OUT OF ANY AND ALL LEGAL HEARINGS WHILE LYING ABOUT AND DEFAMING MY GOOD NAME UNDER OATH AND THE FACT THAT IF I HAD RECEIVED NOTICES OF ANY LEGAL CASE HEARINGS IN MY NAME , I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CLEARLY SPEAK FOR MYSELF HAD I BEEN IN THE COURT PROCEEDINGS AND THEY WOULD NOW HAVE BEEN EXPOSED FOR THE CON'S /FRAUDSTER'S AND THIEVES THAT THEY ARE -
HERE ARE OTHER LAWS THAT YOU HAVE ALSO VIOLATED
> WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS >
A parliamentary panel has recommended that ministers, the higher judiciary, security organisations, defence and intelligence forces and regulatory authorities be brought under the whistleblowers protection bill to check corruption and willful misuse of power. "No organisation of the
Advertisement
government should be left out from public scrutiny and accountability provided for in the bill," said Jayanthi Natarajan, who chaired the standing committee of personnel, public grievances, law and justice that examined the whistleblowers protection bill.The report, submitted to Rajya Sabha chairman on Thursday, noted that the RTI Act, 2005 does not exempt the armed forces nor does it completely exempt secularity or intelligence organisations.
In casting the net wide while covering central, state and public sector employees, the panel rejected the contention that certain agencies be kept out of the proposed law, which seeks to encourage disclosure of information in public interest.
Introduced in Lok Sabha in August 2010, the importance and relevance of the whistleblowers bill has increased in the backdrop of a growing outcry against corruption and the demand for stringent laws and mechanisms to deal with it.
As the bill deals with corruption and transparency in public life, Natarajan hoped it would be in harmony with other related laws, including the proposed lokpal bill.
The whistleblowers bill, among other things, calls for a regular mechanism to receive complaints of corruption, fast-tracking such cases, building safeguards against victimisation and frivolous complaints and protecting whistleblowers so that the identity of the complainant is not compromised with "at any cost and any level" unless it is with the person's written consent.
As the disclosure made is in public interest, the burden to ensure that the complainant is not victimised lies with the competent authority, the panel said.
It also seeks similar protection for witnesses supporting the whistleblowers and calls for severe punishment for those exposing the identity of people disclosing information by giving the CVC powers of a civil court.
The authority is also supposed to give reasons for dismissing a complaint and a reasonable hearing if the complainant is not satisfied with the dismissal of the complaint or outcome of the inquiry.
It also suggested that the rules provide a reasonable time limit for conducting the inquiry by the competent authority.
In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right. Fraud can violate civil law (e.g., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud or recover monetary compensation) or criminal law (e.g., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities), or it may cause no loss of money, property, or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong.[1] The purpose of fraud may be monetary gain or other benefits, for example by obtaining a passport, travel document, or driver's license, or mortgage fraud, where the perpetrator may attempt to qualify for a mortgage by way of false statements.[2]
Internal fraud, also known as "insider fraud", is fraud committed or attempted by someone within an organisation such as an employee.[3]
Washington[edit]
A person found guilty of financial exploitation, abuse or neglect cannot inherit any benefit from their victim.[8]
In common law jurisdictions, as a criminal offense, fraud takes many different forms, some general (e.g., theft by false pretense) and some specific to particular categories of victims or misconduct (e.g., bank fraud, insurance fraud, forgery). The elements of fraud as a crime similarly vary. The requisite elements of perhaps the most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the perpetrator intending to keep the property from the victim.[8]
the formulation of mens rea set forth in the Model Penal Code has been highly influential throughout the United States in clarifying the discussion of the different modes of culpability.[23][39] The following levels of mens rea are found in the MPC §2.02(2),[42][43]: 60–62 and are considered by the United States Supreme Court to be the four states of mind that give rise to criminal liability:[44]
- Negligently: a "reasonable person" ought to be aware of a "substantial and unjustifiable risk" that is a "gross deviation" from a normal standard of care.[45]
- Recklessly: the actor "consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in "gross deviation" from a normal standard of care.[45]
- Knowingly: the actor is "practically certain" that his conduct will lead to the result,[46] or is aware to a high probability that his conduct is of a prohibited nature, or is aware to a high probability that the attendant circumstances exist.
- Purposefully: the actor consciously engages in conduct and "desires" the result. The Supreme Court has not found a large difference between purposeful and knowing conduct, not only in theory but also in application.[46]
Coercive control is a form of abuse where the main goal is to degrade, isolate, and deprive a person of their rights to physical security, dignity, and respect, which puts the victim in a state of terror and entrapment, and includes tactics such as monitoring movements, social isolation, and restriction of access to financial resources, employment, education, or medical care (Pitman, 2016; Stark, 2007, 2013; Stark & Hester, 2019). For instance, abusers may use tactics involving threats to hurt or kill their victims, their children or pets, or isolating them from family, friends, and support services. Coercive control may also involve economic abuse, by threatening economic security and independence (Postmus et al., 2020), intimate partner stalking (Mechanic et al., 2008), as well as reproductive coercion, such as pregnancy coercion or interference with contraception (Miller et al., 2010).
What Is Misrepresentation?
To make a "misrepresentation" simply means to state as a fact something which is false or untrue. To make a material "omission" is to omit or withhold the statement of a fact, knowledge of which is necessary to make other statements not misleading.
There are several qualifications for a misrepresentation to constitute fraud:
- A misrepresentation must be false (or an omission must make other statements misleading), and it must be material in the sense that it relates to a matter of some importance or significance rather than a minor or trivial detail.
- A misrepresentation (or omission) must also relate to an existing fact. Ordinarily, a promise to do something in the future does not relate to an existing fact and cannot be the basis of a claim for fraud unless the person who made the promise did so without any present intent to perform it or with a positive intent not to perform it. Similarly, a mere expression of opinion does not relate to an existing fact and cannot be the basis of a claim of fraud unless the person stating the opinion has exclusive or superior knowledge of existing facts which are inconsistent with such opinion.
- A misrepresentation (or omission) must be made knowingly and intentionally, not as a result of mistake or accident; that is, that the person either knew or should have known of the falsity of the misrepresentation (or the false effect of the omission), or that he made the misrepresentation (or omission) in negligent disregard of its truth or falsity.
What Is Material?
The word "material" means that the subject matter of the statement (or concealment) related to a fact or circumstance which would be important to the decision to be made as distinguished from an insignificant, trivial or unimportant detail. For example, for insurance fraud to be material, an assertion (or concealment) must relate to a fact or circumstance that would affect the liability of an insurer (if made during an investigation of the loss), or would affect the decision to issue the policy, or the amount of coverage or the premium (if made in the application for the policy).W
The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The question for courts has been what standard should be applied to evaluate a defendant’s “knowledge.” The US Supreme Court recently clarified that courts must examine a defendant’s subjective belief as of the time a claim is submitted.
- Establishing a federal civil cause of action for individuals whose intimate visual images are disclosed without their consent, allowing a victim to recover damages and legal fees; creating a new National Resource Center on Cybercrimes Against Individuals; and supporting State, Tribal, and local government efforts to prevent and prosecute cybercrimes, including cyberstalking and the nonconsensual distribution of intimate images.
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN'S ACT 2023-
§12494. Prohibition on retaliation
(a) Non-retaliation requirement
No public housing agency or owner or manager of housing assisted under a covered housing program shall discriminate against any person because that person has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this part, or because that person testified, assisted, or participated in any matter related to this subpart.
(b) Prohibition on coercion
No public housing agency or owner or manager of housing assisted under a covered housing program shall coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with, or retaliate against, any person in the exercise or enjoyment of, on account of the person having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of the person having aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of, any rights or protections under this subpart, including-
(1) intimidating or threatening any person because that person is assisting or encouraging a person entitled to claim the rights or protections under this subpart; and
(2) retaliating against any person because that person has participated in any investigation or action to enforce this subpart.
(c) Implementation
The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Attorney General shall implement and enforce this subpart consistent with, and in a manner that provides, the rights and remedies provided for in title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.).
(
- (1) Employs or attempts to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud or manipulate;
- (2) Makes or attempts to make any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
Rules 9j-1(a)(1) and (2) are largely based on Rules 10b-5(a) and (b), and prohibit misstatements and fraudulent schemes. As with Rules 10b-5(a) and (b), the SEC expects a scienter requirement to be applied under Rules 9j-1(a)(1) and (2). Unlike Rule 10b-5, but like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s 2011 rule based on 10b-5 (Rule 180.1), Rules 9j-1(a) and (b) also expressly prohibit “attempts” to make misstatements or employ devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud.
- (3) Obtains money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
- (4) Engages in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person;
- (5) Attempts to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or attempts to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person;
Rules 9j-1(a)(3)–(5) are based on Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Rules 9j-1(a)(3) and (4) prohibit obtaining money or property by way of a misstatement of a material fact or engaging in any act that would operate as a fraud or deceit. As under Section 17(a), the SEC intends to apply a simple negligence standard under Rules 9j-1(a)(3) and (4). Rule 9j-1(a)(5) prohibits unsuccessful attempts at the acts identified in Rules 9j-1(a)(3) and (4), and the SEC expects scienter to be required for liability to attach in connection with such attempts.
- (6) Manipulates or attempts to manipulate the price or valuation of any security-based swap, or any payment or delivery related thereto.
